The appellant had sought the procedure to secure an appointment with the IBBI Chairperson and details of appointments given to […]
Case of Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta vs Dinesh Kumar Deora, NCLAT Delhi Judgement Dated 21st May 2025. The appellant authority held that statutory
IBBI has issued new guidelines for creating a panel of Insolvency Professionals (IPs) eligible for appointment as Interim Resolution Professionals
IBBI has introduced revised and simplified forms for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), effective from 1st June 2025. The existing
The key changes include the addition to Regulation 18, allowing the committee of creditors to invite interim finance providers as
NCLAT, Service of demand notice under section 8 (CIRP by Operational Creditor) to registered email address of Corporate Debtor sufficient: Case
IBBI authorities directed to adhere to timelines in RTI case: The applicant had sought certified copies of the latest IBBI guidelines
Amendments to IBBI Insolvency Resolution for Personal Guarantors Regulations: The notification introduces a new Regulation 17B, which addresses scenarios where no
Amendment to IBBI Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons Regulations: The notification amends Regulation 40B relating to filing of forms during
IBBI suspends Mr Viswanathan Rajagopalan IP for lapses in his duties under IBC and related regulations: The multiple lapses include delays in appointing an
