The First Appellate Authority (FAA) noted that the RTI Act allows access only to information “held by or under the control of a public authority” under Section 2(f) and 2(j). The FAA observed that all relevant file notings and communications related to the appellant’s grievances had already been provided. Requests for opinions, analysis, or information not recorded by IBBI fell outside the scope of the Act and would disproportionately divert resources. Allegations regarding meeting procedures, resolution plans, and claims of fraud were either addressed through prior communications or were not held by the Board. Accordingly, FAA concluded that the CPIO responses were adequate and no further information was required to be created or furnished.